1. Home
  2. Zoom Training Agendas
  3. OnTarget
  4. Question Quality Distribution Point Biserial Correlation (Technical)

Question Quality Distribution Point Biserial Correlation (Technical)

The Question Quality Frequency Distribution chart displays the distribution of point biserial correlation coefficients across test items, providing a comprehensive view of item discrimination quality within an assessment instrument.

Point Biserial Correlation Definition

Point biserial correlation (rpb) measures the strength of association between a dichotomous variable (typically item response: correct/incorrect) and a continuous variable (usually total test score). This metric serves as a primary indicator of item discrimination quality.

Formula and Calculation

The point biserial correlation coefficient is calculated using:

rpb = (Mp – Mq) / St × √(p × q)

Where:

  • Mp = Mean total score for examinees who answered the item correctly
  • Mq = Mean total score for examinees who answered the item incorrectly
  • St = Standard deviation of total scores for all examinees
  • p = Proportion of examinees who answered correctly
  • q = Proportion of examinees who answered incorrectly (1-p)

Distribution Analysis

Current Distribution Characteristics

From the displayed distribution:

  • Peak Performance: Highest frequency (8 items) falls within the 0.2-0.29 range (acceptable quality)
  • Balanced Distribution: Moderate representation across good (0.3-0.39) and below-average (0.1-0.19) ranges
  • Quality Indicators: No items in the poor (≤0.09) or excellent (≥0.4) categories suggest consistent but improvable item quality

Technical Considerations

Discrimination Index Relationship

Point biserial correlation relates directly to classical discrimination index (D) through: D = (U – L) / n Where U = upper group correct responses, L = lower group correct responses, n = group size

Item Difficulty Impact

Optimal point biserial values occur when item difficulty (p-value) approaches 0.5, following the relationship: Maximum rpb ≈ √(p × q)

Assessment Recommendations

Immediate Actions:

  1. Review items in 0.1-0.19 range for content clarity and key validity
  2. Analyze distractor effectiveness for items below 0.2 threshold
  3. Consider pilot testing revised items before implementation

Quality Assurance:

  • Target distribution should show majority of items in 0.2+ ranges
  • Investigate items with negative point biserial values (indicating reverse discrimination)
  • Monitor correlation stability across different examinee populations

This distribution analysis enables data-driven decisions for assessment improvement and ensures measurement reliability within the OnTarget assessment framework.

Updated on 05/29/2025

Was this article helpful?

Related Articles

Need Support?
Can't find the answer you're looking for?
Contact Support