1. Home
  2. STAAR Impact Report – Group to State Comparison Report

STAAR Impact Report – Group to State Comparison Report

The use of inferential statistics in educational settings allows us to make strategic decisions based on data. We avoid guessing, speculating, and listening to the squeaky wheels about what is effective, what is not, what should stay in the budget, what should be eliminated, what should be added or expanded, and what should be changed or modified. Inferential statistics provided by OnTarget’s STAAR Impact Reports go a long way toward supplying the foundation for smart decisions.

For educational leaders, data-driven decisions are often focused on comparisons, such as comparing methods of instruction, methods of delivery, instructional focus, teacher performance, professional staff, or even schools. When two groups are compared, the statistic that is most useful in data-driven decisions is called a students’ sample t-test. The purpose of a paired samples t-test, is to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between the mean scores of two groups, your student group as compared to the overall population in the state.

A single samples t-test is used when two groups have no relationship to one another other. They are independent of one another. In a single samples t-test, Group 1 (i.e. everyone in the state who took this same STAAR exam) is being compared to group 2 (i.e the students in your sample). The OnTarget STAAR Impact Report – Group to State, utilizes the single samples t-test, which can be of great benefit to educational leaders who want to determine impact and efficacy of a program as compared to all the students who took the same exam.

Some examples of when to utilize this report might include the following:

• When assessing the ability of a new instructional method to raise standardized test scores
• When measuring the impact of an innovative program on students’ attitudes
• When weighing the cost benefit of a novel approach on remediation
• When tracking community support from last year to this year • When monitoring the effect of professional development training on knowledge acquisition

The STAAR Impact Group to State report answer the question, “Was the performance of my students statistically significantly different than the rest of the population in the state?” And if so, “What was the effect or the impact of that difference?” In other words, did implementing some program have an impact on overall student performance? when compared to everyone else in the state who took that same test.

The t-test is a very useful tool in educational settings. Often we are comparing two methods, two programs, two groups of students, or two groups of stakeholders to make a decision. The t-test is a simple and straightforward statistic that allows us to get beyond a frequency count and is a tool that educational leaders can use to make decisions confidently and then take the appropriate action based on the results.

NOTE: Impact or effect does not automatically mean or suggest causation. Other confounding or contributing variables or factors could alter the effect or the impact. It is up to the person reviewing the report to know and understand program implementation and identify confounding variables to best ascertain the level of the impact or effect.

Raw Score Distribution Graph

Updated on 05/27/2022

Was this article helpful?

Need Support?
Can't find the answer you're looking for?
Contact Support